Volume 5, Issue 2 (6-2023)
sjis 2023, 5(2): 1-7 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mahmoudi Rashid S. Exponential Stability and L_2 Gain Analysis for Systems with Infinite Distributed Delay by Scalar Kernels to Track a Surface Vessel by Submarine. sjis 2023; 5 (2) :1-7
URL: http://sjis.srpub.org/article-5-198-en.html
URL: http://sjis.srpub.org/article-5-198-en.html
Ph.D. Student in Electrical Engineering Department, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract: (281 Views)
In this paper, the problem of trajectory optimization in tracking the location of surface moving targets by measuring the side angle alone is studied. The performance of target tracking with side angle alone depends on the stability of the target position in the target observer's motion path or the optimal observer maneuver. First, the modeling of the path control problem is performed by the kernel-scalar matrix method. Then, by analyzing the L_2 interest rate, the control law is obtained for moving independently of the initial conditions. The advantages of the proposed modeling are maximizing the delay limit for the stability of the entire maneuver time, calculating the control rule at the start of the maneuver and high flexibility in applying the travel restrictions. The efficiency of the method presented by simulation with scalar kernel matrix method with control methods of delayed systems with distributed delay is shown and compared by recent references. Performance is also evaluated in different scenarios and its reliability is checked. This method is also used in the practical problem of tracking a surface vessel by submarine.
Keywords: Exponential stability, L_2 interest rate analysis, Infinite distributed delay, Scalar kernel, Side tracking alone
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Control and Systems Engineering
Received: 2023/03/18 | Revised: 2023/05/22 | Accepted: 2023/05/25 | Published: 2023/06/30
Received: 2023/03/18 | Revised: 2023/05/22 | Accepted: 2023/05/25 | Published: 2023/06/30
References
1. Sadeghi M, Behnia F, Amiri RJITOSP. Optimal sensor placement for 2-D range-only target localization in constrained sensor geometry. 2020; 68: 2316-2327. [DOI:10.1109/TSP.2020.2985645]
2. Ali W, Li Y, Raja MAZ, Khan WU, He YJE. State estimation of an underwater markov chain maneuvering target using intelligent computing. 2021; 23(9): 1124. [DOI:10.3390/e23091124]
3. Tang Y, Mou J, Chen L, Zhou YJJOMS. Engineering, review of ship behavior characteristics in mixed waterborne traffic. 2022; 10(2): 139. [DOI:10.3390/jmse10020139]
4. Alexandri T, Diamant RJITOMC. A reverse bearings only target motion analysis for autonomous underwater vehicle navigation. 2018; 18(3): 494-506. [DOI:10.1109/TMC.2018.2840997]
5. Zohuri B. Stealth technology in radar energy warfare and the challenges of stealth technology: Springer, 2020; 205-310. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-40619-6_4]
6. Dahm J. Special mission aircraft and unmanned systems. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 2020.
7. Blechman BM. International Security Yearbook 1984/85. Routledge, 2019. [DOI:10.4324/9780429036002]
8. Ndaimani H. GIS and remote sensing applications for modelling the distribution of elephants and their interaction with vegetation. 2019.
9. Wakita K, et al. On neural network identification for low-speed ship maneuvering model. 2022; 1-14. [DOI:10.1007/s00773-021-00867-1]
10. Guzzi J. Path planning for mobile robots in the real world: handling multiple objectives, hierarchical structures and partial information. Università della Svizzera Italiana, 2018.
11. Badnava S, et al. Platoon transitional maneuver control system: A review. 2021. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3089615]
12. Gryte K, Sollie ML, Johansen TAJJOI, Systems R. Control system architecture for automatic recovery of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles in a moving arrest system. 2021; 103(4): 1-20. [DOI:10.1007/s10846-021-01521-z]
13. Fan DD, Agha-Mohammadi AA, Theodorou EAJAPA. Deep learning tubes for tube mpc. 2020. [DOI:10.15607/RSS.2020.XVI.087]
14. Hofmann R, Hosseini S, Holzapfel F. Flight-test plan design and evaluation in a closed-loop framework for a general aviation aircraft. AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, 2022; 2170. [DOI:10.2514/6.2022-2170]
15. Desmarais F, Boobyer K, Bruce TJSMR. Lingering effects of sponsor transgression against a national fan base: the importance of respect in relationship management. 2021; 24(4): 642-672. [DOI:10.1080/14413523.2021.1880743]
16. Mitra A, Richards JA, Bagchi S, Sundaram SJAR. Resilient distributed state estimation with mobile agents: overcoming Byzantine adversaries, communication losses, and intermittent measurements. 2019; 43(3): 743-768. [DOI:10.1007/s10514-018-9813-7]
17. Bayat F, Najafinia S, Aliyari MJESWA. Mobile robots path planning: Electrostatic potential field approach. 2018; 100: 68-78. [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.050]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |