1. Long, X. F., Yang, P., Guo, H. X., & Wu, X. W. (2017). Review of fault diagnosis methods for large wind turbines. Power system technology, 41(11), 3480-3490.
2. Lebranchu, A., Charbonnier, S., Bérenguer, C., & Prévost, F. (2019). A combined mono-and multi-turbine approach for fault indicator synthesis and wind turbine monitoring using SCADA data. ISA transactions, 87, 272-281. [
DOI:10.1016/j.isatra.2018.11.041] [
PMID]
3. Yu, D., Chen, Z. M., Xiahou, K. S., Li, M. S., Ji, T. Y., & Wu, Q. H. (2018). A radically data-driven method for fault detection and diagnosis in wind turbines. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 99, 577-584. [
DOI:10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.009]
4. Laouti, N., Sheibat-Othman, N., & Othman, S. (2011). Support vector machines for fault detection in wind turbines. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 44(1), 7067-7072. [
DOI:10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.02560]
5. Qiu, Y., Jiang, H., Feng, Y., Cao, M., Zhao, Y., & Li, D. (2016). A new fault diagnosis algorithm for PMSG wind turbine power converters under variable wind speed conditions. Energies, 9(7), 548. [
DOI:10.3390/en9070548]
6. Simani, S., & Castaldi, P. (2014). Active actuator fault‐tolerant control of a wind turbine benchmark model. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 24(8-9), 1283-1303. [
DOI:10.1002/rnc.2993]
7. Mojallal, A., & Lotfifard, S. (2017). Multi-physics graphical model-based fault detection and isolation in wind turbines. IEEE transactions on smart grid, 9(6), 5599-5612. [
DOI:10.1109/TSG.2017.2691782]
8. Lei, J., Liu, C., & Jiang, D. (2019). Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on Long Short-term memory networks. Renewable energy, 133, 422-432. [
DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.031]
9. Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J., 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8), pp.1735-1780. [
DOI:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735] [
PMID]
10. Chen, J., Li, J., Chen, W., Wang, Y., & Jiang, T. (2020). Anomaly detection for wind turbines based on the reconstruction of condition parameters using stacked denoising autoencoders. Renewable Energy, 147, 1469-1480. [
DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.041]
11. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł. and Polosukhin, I., 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
12. Sabour, S., Frosst, N. and Hinton, G.E., 2017. Dynamic routing between capsules. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
13. Ahmed, S. F., Alam, M. S. B., Hassan, M., Rozbu, M. R., Ishtiak, T., Rafa, N., ... & Gandomi, A. H. (2023). Deep learning modelling techniques: current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(11), 13521-13617. [
DOI:10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8]
14. Boudiaf, A., Moussaoui, A., Dahane, A., & Atoui, I. (2016). A comparative study of various methods of bearing faults diagnosis using the case Western Reserve University data. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 16(2), 271-284. [
DOI:10.1007/s11668-016-0080-7]
15. Smith, W. A., & Randall, R. B. (2015). Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 64, 100-131. [
DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.021] [
PMCID]
16. Zhang, X., Zhao, B., & Lin, Y. (2021). Machine learning based bearing fault diagnosis using the case western reserve university data: A review. Ieee Access, 9, 155598-155608. [
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3128669]
17. J. Platt, et al., Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods, Advances in large margin classifiers 10 (3) (1999) 61-74. [
DOI:10.7551/mitpress/1113.003.0008] [
PMID]
آیتمی وجود ندارد
، مهدی شریف زاده*2 
